Glaucoma Research
Chat Highlights
June 26, 2002
Norma Devine, Editor
On Wednesday, June 26, 2002,
Dr.
Rick Wilson, a glaucoma specialist at Wills, and the glaucoma
chat group discussed "Glaucoma Research."
Moderator: Dr. Rick,
is there a particular aspect of glaucoma research that interests
you the most?
Dr. Rick Wilson: I'm still
a big proponent of stem cell research as the future to be able
to restore sight, not just try to prevent loss. The other
area that has great potential is neuroprotection, i.e., treatment
to increase the optic nerve's resistance to pressure rather than
trying to lower it. Doing both would be the best approach.
P: Would regeneration
of nerve damage help an aniridic eye?
Dr. Rick Wilson: It should
help any eye that has nerve damage. In aniridia, the
fovea, the center part of vision, has been absent since birth.
Perhaps the stem cells could be given normal genes to help a fovea
develop.
P: I live in the U.K.
and will be the first patient to receive stem cells to the nerve
in my blind eye. How would those cells be delivered to the
optic nerve?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Probably
a tiny needle, one much smaller than you have seen before, would
be used in the retina or just in front of it.
Moderator: What is
a stem cell?
Dr. Rick Wilson: When sperm
meets the egg, it forms a cell that divides into two, then into
four cells, etc. All the original cells can become anything
they want, depending upon the stimuli they are exposed to.
As the organism continues to grow, it starts to differentiate,
with different cells becoming more of one type of tissue, such
as muscle or bone. The early cells are stem cells.
P: Isn't it more difficult
to get stem cells from bone marrow?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Cells from
the bone marrow may be coaxed into becoming less specialized and
then re-specialized. But it is much more difficult than
taking four- or eight-cell embryos left over from fertilization
clinics. If those cells are not used, they will be destroyed.
P: Isn't stem-cell
research controversial?
Dr. Rick Wilson: The greatest
hindrance to stem cell research in the U.S. is our government.
I respect anyone's feeling about abortion, but I cannot understand
sacrificing lifesaving advances to save four- and eight-celled
organisms that will be destroyed anyway. Wouldn't it be
great, for instance, for diabetics who are allergic to all insulin
to be able to get a new pancreas made from stem cells from their
own body?
P: Isn't the U.S. lagging
behind other nations in stem-cell research?
Dr. Rick Wilson: England
recently recruited one of our best researchers in stem-cell research.
The research climate in England is more conducive to advancement. Europe,
Israel, and Singapore will probably lead the science of stem cells.
Sorry to get on my soapbox, but the issue drives me to distraction.
P: How much research
is sponsored by drug companies versus other sources, such as universities,
charities, the government and the public?
Dr. Rick Wilson: As you know,
our government will not fund any research on stem cells except
from existent lines. That is slowing down the pace of research,
since science is expensive. Some venture capital companies
are funding research without government assistance. All
pharmaceutical companies are looking at stem cells for a variety
of uses.
P: Are researchers
trying to turn stem cells into nerve cells?
Dr. Rick Wilson: That has
already been done at Johns Hopkins and many other centers.
Now research is trying to make sure the cells differentiate into
the correct nerve cells and do not grow tumors or show other unwanted
side effects.
P: I have stem-cell
deterioration in my left eye. I'm reluctant to undergo a
cornea transplant because of my severe glaucoma. How is
stem-cell research proceeding in that area?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Recent research
has shown that stem cells injected into animal retinas with nerves
that have been damaged can grow back to the brain, developing
into nerve cells. The amazing thing was that these cells
found the correct paths to grow back to the brain, rather
than just growing. Developing that for human beings will
take a while, but probably will become commonplace in our lifetimes.
P: Cyclosporin is used
to stop rejection of stem cell grafts. Cyclosporin
is an awful drug. Is research being done to find something
else?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Yes, researchers are
looking for drugs that are more effective, as well as drugs that
may be as effective as the ones we have now, but are more benign.
P: Is Copaxone going
to be available any time soon for optic nerve protection?
Dr. Rick Wilson: I'm sorry,
but I am not familiar with the drug.
P: Copaxone is a vaccination
being developed in Israel.
Dr. Rick Wilson: I had never
heard it called that, but know the research you speak of.
It seems promising, but is too early to be sure if it would be
neuroprotective of a chronic debilitating stimulus like high pressure
for years.
(Editor's note: Professor Michal Schwartz of the Weizmann Institute’s
Neurobiology Department in Rehovot, Israel, conducted a study
that found vaccination with Copaxone may be neuroprotective.
Since the FDA has already approved the use of Copaxone for multiple
sclerosis, scientists hope human trials can begin soon.)
P: Are you interested
in researching any particular drugs?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Most of
the drugs we are looking at come from the neurological, especially
the stroke, literature. One of the problems with drops is that
not much of the drop makes it to the back of the eye. Nevertheless,
it seems that some of the glaucoma drops may improve circulation
slightly, and in that sense may be neuroprotective.
P: Are you aware of
any research being done on ICE (Iridocorneal endothelial) syndrome
that involves the cornea?
Dr. Rick Wilson: The cornea
is the cause of ICE syndrome. Diseased cells from the lining of
the cornea grow over the drain in the eye, blocking it with a
clear membrane, and pulling the iris up over the drain and, in
many cases, pulling the iris apart.
P: Is the cause of
ICE syndrome known?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Since there
is a higher prevalence of herpes in corneas of patients
with ICE syndrome, compared to the general population, it is thought
that a fetal, or early childhood ocular infection, with herpes
might be the cause of ICE syndrome.
P: What limits are
placed on a doctor's remuneration from drug companies when the
doctor participates in research involving drugs?
Dr. Rick Wilson: If the patient
is being treated as part of a study, the patient should not be
charged. Most drug companies pay for staff and doctors'
time, but not at the level that would be made if the doctor was
seeing paying patients. Research is not a well-paid field
compared to patient care or business.
P: Are researchers
trying to solve the problem of glaucoma directly? For example,
are they asking (or have they ever asked) exactly what went wrong
with an eye that developed open-angle glaucoma? Have they
tried to restore the original through discoveries in that direction
-- as, for example, a doctor might set a broken bone? I'm
thinking along mechanical lines.
Dr. Rick Wilson: They are
asking those questions all the time. We're getting closer but
the clues are not easy to come by.
P: Little research
involves the effect of drugs on children. Labels state the
drugs are not recommended for children. Is anything being
done about that?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Yes, the
FDA has asked all companies to research the safety and effectiveness
of their current medications on infants and children. The
FDA is giving inducements, I think, in terms of patent extension,
to prove that.
Moderator: Thank you,
Dr. Rick.
Dr. Rick Wilson: You're welcome.
Have a happy Fourth of July. There will be no doctor here
on the Fourth. See you in two weeks.
End of highlights for June 26, 2002.
On July 10, Dr. Wilson discussed "Shunt Surgery" in the Chat
room. Click here for highlights
of that
meeting.
Click here for the most recent
glaucoma chat highlights and links to the chat archives.
Click here for
upcoming glaucoma chat events.
|