Visual Fields & Functional Vision
Chat Highlights
October 26, 2005
Norma Devine, Editor
On Wednesday, October 26, 2005, Dr.
Rick Wilson, a glaucoma specialist at Wills, and the glaucoma
chat group discussed "Visual Fields & Functional Vision."
Moderator: Many patients have a poor understanding of vision
testing. For instance, some wonder why a glaucoma patient who
reads 20/20 on the Snellen chart would complain about poor vision.
Dr. Rick Wilson: There are several reasons for that. One is the
loss of contrast sensitivity. Patients may be able to see dark
black letters on a bright white background in a dark room, but
those are not normal conditions. That is high contrast. In our
daily lives, we more often have gray-on-gray, especially in the
evening under twilight conditions or at night. Patients with glaucoma
have trouble under low-contrast conditions.
Another problem is their reduced visual field. I have patients
who can see only two or three letters on any line because their
central visual field is that small. While they may have 20/20
vision, they can be legally blind because of their small field
of vision. Intermediate to that stage are many where the holes
in the vision are very annoying. Some patients lose the blue-yellow
discrimination, which causes more complaints about their vision.
P: Does glaucoma destroy contrast sensitivity as well as peripheral
vision?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Yes, it destroys the ability to discern between
two objects of low contrast.
P: Can the damage that has been done to the visual field ever
be reversed or improved?
Dr. Rick Wilson: At any stage of glaucoma, there seems to be
retinal ganglion cells that are destroyed and cannot be returned
to function, and a much smaller group of the cells that are not
quite dead. If the IOP (intraocular pressure) is lowered far enough,
the cells can be partially restored to function.
P: What causes the loss of contrast sensitivity?
Dr. Rick Wilson: The loss of contrast sensitivity is related
to the generalized loss of retinal ganglion cells throughout the
retina. Some areas are preferentially damaged, which results in
blind spots in the vision. Patients with cataracts also lose contrast
sensitivity, but that is regained when the cataract is removed.
P: Then how is it determined whether glaucoma or cataracts are
causing the decreased vision?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Sometimes it is difficult to tell. If the cataract
is not too dense, machines like the PAM (Potential Acuity Meter)
or the laser interferometer can focus light through the cataract
and test the retina.
P: On the printout of a visual field test, is the gray area more
important than the scotoma area in determining the visual field
loss? How is the test used to determine how bad the vision in
the eye is?
Dr. Rick Wilson: The mean deviation can be affected by small
pupils, cataracts, etc. It is not specific for glaucoma. The area
and depth of the scotomas determine the extent of the glaucoma
loss.
P: If you're anticipating a focal nerve defect, as might occur
with glaucoma, isn't the pattern standard deviation the most powerful
indicator of glaucomatous damage, all other things being equal?
That's usually the first thing I look at when they hand me my
print-out.
Dr. Rick Wilson: If there is any kind of generalized depression,
as seen with a small pupil or cataract, then the Corrected Pattern
Standard Deviation would be the diagram I look at. But a focal
defect should be easily visible in the gray scale and the actual
numbers.
P: Glaucoma doctors are expert at evaluating the eye's visual
functioning, but patients are often more interested in using vision
to function. What's the relationship between damage to the visual
field and functional vision?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Usually, the damage to the visual field has
to be quite serious before the patient even notices. That is because
the loss is so slow it is like watching hair grow. The patient
doesn't notice the week-to-week changes, and one eye often can
see where there are holes in the visual field of the other eye
and compensate for it. Often, it is only when a blind spot is
noticed that the patient becomes aware of the loss.
P: How often should glaucoma patients have a visual field test,
and how much change is worrisome? I return next month for my second
appointment with a glaucoma specialist.
Dr. Rick Wilson: All patients with definite glaucoma should have
a visual field once a year. Patients in whom there is a question
of progression should have visual field tests as often as every
six months. If there seems to be progression in one visual field,
the test should be repeated, because two times out of three, the
next visual field will be back to baseline.
P: Is it asking too much to have three visual field tests to
confirm a loss shown on one of the tests?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Probably. I would doubt that an HMO (Health
Maintenance Organization) would pay for more than two visual field
tests in a six-month period.
P: On the printout of my visual field test, a small area is white,
but most of the area is a light gray, except for where it is black
for the natural blind spot. My doctor said my test was normal.
Does almost completely light gray indicate normal vision?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Yes.
P: Do you go by the grayscale image or the numbers?
Dr. Rick Wilson: I use the numbers, unless there is a great deal
of damage throughout the visual field. Then I look at the grayscale
to key me in on which numbers are most important to compare.
P: Which part of the visual field corresponds to the macula?
Dr. Rick Wilson: The center of the visual field is the part seen
by the macula.
P: Does the visual field test measure contrast sensitivity?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Spatial contrast sensitivity is measurable to
some extent, but is usually checked with printed charts. Temporal
contrast sensitivity tests the ability to detect changes of contrast
over time. A video monitor is usually used for that.
P: Should glaucoma patients be seeing retina specialists regularly
for evaluations?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Only if they have a retinal disease, like macular
degeneration, or traction on the retina from the vitreous gel
in the eye, which could pull a hole in the retina and cause a
retinal detachment.
P: I take my visual field tests on an Octopus 101. What numbers
are important to understand the deviation? The right is 1.9 and
left is 0.6. Does that mean I am legally blind?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Are those numbers the RMS (root mean square)
or the average deviation from normal, or what? I haven't used
the Octopus in years, although it remains an excellent machine
and the one I started on.
P: I have absolutely no idea. It shows a graph with a line going
down below normal. After the word "deviation" there
is "dB."
Dr. Rick Wilson: Then that seems to be the average deviation
from normal at each point on your curve. If so, the numbers you
gave may not be too bad. What you need to look for is the difference
(space) between your line and the normal line.
P: Since it's said that anatomical damage or loss precedes functional
loss, shouldn't you be able to correlate a defect on a visual
field test with measurable defect on nerve examination, whether
visually or by HRT (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph), etc? In other
words, by the time nerve damage is sufficient to cause a detectable
field deficit, shouldn't it be observable to the clinician, and
its quadrant location corroborate that observation?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Yes, about 85% of the time.
P: I wear trifocals, and although I have 20/20 vision through
the distance portion of my eyeglasses, that's only when looking
at distant objects. Close vision through that part of the lens
is difficult-to-impossible, particularly for my right eye. For
my last visual field test, the technician had me wear my eyeglasses.
Of course, I was looking at the stimulus (the little flashes of
light) through my distance lens. The technician added a corrective
lens for the right eye, but not for the left eye. I would have
seen the stimulus better, I think, without my glasses, because
I'm myopic. Before taking visual field tests, what kinds of lens
adjustments should be made?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Patients who wear glasses have lenses put in
front of their eyes in the holder equal to their distance prescription,
with added power for near, depending upon an age chart supplied
by the company. You are correct that the technician did not know
what she was doing if you wore your trifocals during the examination.
P: Are you using the AccuMap? If so, what is your opinion of
it?
Dr. Rick Wilson: We are using it and find it intriguing, but
not a replacement for standard visual field testing.
P: Can floaters in the vitreous affect visual field tests?
Dr. Rick Wilson: If they are large and almost stationary. They
usually are fleeting and do not affect the tests.
P: I read about a study that found a daily intake of .15 g of
lipoic acid improved the visual sensitivity of glaucoma patients.
Can you comment, please?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Sorry, if
I read the study, I have forgotten it. In general, antioxidants,
vitamins, and herbal supplements have not proved particularly
helpful in glaucoma. Some of the latter need to be used
with care, as they may interfere with the action of systemic medications
or augment them.
On November 2, Dr. Wilson discussed "Early and Late Complications
of Trabeculectomies" in the Chat room. Click
here for highlights of that meeting.
Click here for the most recent
glaucoma chat highlights and links to the chat archives.
Click here for
upcoming glaucoma chat events.
|