The Image of Image Analyzers
Chat Highlights
December 7, 2005
Norma Devine, Editor
On Wednesday, December 7, 2005, Dr.
Jonathan Myers, a glaucoma specialist at Wills, and the
glaucoma chat group discussed "The Image of Image Analyzers."
Moderator: Our topic
is "The Image of Image Analyzers." What are image analyzers?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: They are the newer machines for imaging the
optic nerve. Many of you may have heard of the OCT, HRT, or GDx.
OCT (optical coherence tomography) gives 3D images of thin optical
"slices" of the nerve fiber layer and retina. HRT (Heidelberg
Retina Tomography) performs confocal scanning of the surface of
the optic nerve and retina. GDx (scanning laser polarimetry) provides
a measure of the nerve fiber layer's thickness across the retina.
P: Most of us here know we have glaucoma, so we're more interested
in detecting progression than in diagnosis. Are the new machines
good at detecting progression?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: All of these machines are trying to analyze
the optic nerve and nerve fiber layer to look for glaucomatous
damage and progressive damage. However, there's much more evidence
on the efficacy of these machines to diagnose than there is regarding
progression. Only a few studies have been published regarding
progression. The best is by B. Chauhan in Nova Scotia.
In that study, 77 patients were followed for about 5 years. In
that time, about a quarter got worse by visual field test and
by HRT. Only 1 or 2 patients got worse by visual field test, but
not by HRT. And about 40% got worse by HRT, but not visual field.
That suggested to some that the HRT might be picking up earlier
damage, but there's no clear proof.
Moderator: How did these results compare with examination of
the optic nerve by a doctor?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Studies have shown that the optic nerve imagers
usually, but not always, correlate to the doctor's clinical findings.
In cases where they differ from the doctor's exam, either could
be correct. Often the doctor and the machine are looking at two
different aspects of the anatomy and physiology, so they may both
be right, even if they seem to disagree.
P: Visual field tests are only as accurate as the patient taking
the test. How accurate is an HRT?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: You are on to an important issue: reliability
and reproducibility. We all know that visual field tests have
a "human" component. The optic nerve imagers also have
variability issues. Is the patient holding still? Is a cataract
obscuring the best image? Is the technician the best technician?
For this reason, there is also some variability in the nerve imagers.
In major studies, the variability in the nerve imagers isn't too
bad. However, the variability of visual field testing also is
often better than in the "real world."
It is very important that the technician be very well trained
for these machines, and that the doctor not "over-interpret"
findings when the study quality is not optimal.
P: I've had two HRTs, and both reported many numbers. Are any
especially relevant for glaucoma progression?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The output of these machines has a variety
of measures and indices, many compared to averages of "normal"
patients. In the case of the HRT, these include measures of the
optic disc size, shape, cup size and shape, rim area and volume,
and topography profile. Additionally, in the HRT the patient's
values are compared in six sectors versus corresponding values
from a normative database for patients of a similar age and race.
The GDx has similar measures, but derived from different aspects
of the nerve fiber layer as it courses from the optic nerve to
the outlying retina.
The OCT's output is also similar to that. All of them have ways
to present each new study's findings in comparison to the last
exam. Regarding this, the HRT's analysis is the most sophisticated.
P: What tests, other than intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual
fields, should a patient with diagnosed glaucoma be having and
how often?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The typical testing for glaucoma patients
as recommended by the AAO (American Academy of Ophthalmology)
includes frequent IOP checks, yearly visual field tests, and disc
drawing and/or photos or imaging, and gonioscopy.
P: How much training do ophthalmologists receive in evaluating
the output of the new devices and in using that information in
diagnosing and managing the treatment of individual patients?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Because these machines are new, most ophthalmologists
have had little or no training in interpreting the output. The
training doctors receive is often from the people who sell the
machines, journal articles, or at national meetings and lectures.
P: Isn't it easy for clinicians' enthusiasm for the new devices
to be influenced, not just by the science, but also by marketing
and reimbursement?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Clinicians, like all of us, are influenced
by many things. Most put the patient's welfare first, and are
anxious to find new, easier ways to monitor, diagnose, and treat
a disease like glaucoma. The machines are new and flashy, and
there is an element of "keeping up with the Joneses"
that pushes doctors to buy them. Add in that there is a reasonable
reimbursement for the testing, and that there are companies aggressively
marketing them with claims of great results, and you have a recipe
for rapid adoption. The science behind the machines was lagging
behind the marketing a few years ago, but it has caught up quite
a bit now.
P: On the GDx, what does a blue area indicate?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The GDx printout codes thicker and thinner
regions of the nerve fiber layer with different colors. In general,
thicker areas are orange, thinner areas blue. We expect that the
nerve fiber layer will be thicker towards the top and bottom,
and thinner at the sides of the optic nerve. This is the typical
"hour glass" shape seen, as there is an orange spread
above and below, roughly in the shape of an hour glass. A similar
pattern is seen with the OCT and HRT, but the printout display
is as a graph, not by color, so the thicker regions above and
below show up as two humps corresponding to those areas (the "double
hump" pattern).
P: What role do these new machines play in managing glaucoma?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Many docs are now using the machines to supplement
their examinations. The machines can confirm suspicions of pathology,
and often may alert the doc to subtle missed clues to problems.
So far, the machines have not been shown sufficient to replace
the doctor's careful examination of the optic nerve head, nor
the visual field test. The machines do help to watch for subtle
worsening ("progression"), which can be hard to pick
up. It's like watching grass grow.
P: Can you cite an example of a subtle clue that a doctor might
miss, but a machine might detect?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Sometimes, small areas of damage, such as
a notch, or tiny defect, in just one area of the nerve, can be
hard to appreciate on routine examination. The machine may pick
this up, make it obvious on the printout, and allow the doctor
to look back at the patient, and then notice the notch. On the
other hand, a disc hemorrhage, a tiny spot of blood on the optic
nerve, is also a sign that the glaucoma may be worsening. None
of the current machines will detect disc hemorrhages, but the
doctors can see them on careful examination of the nerve. That's
why the doctor and the machine complement each other.
P: So, therefore, the standard of necessary tests may soon be
changing to include some of these new machines, but how necessary
or useful are they?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The standard of care is currently optic nerve
drawing and photographs. We know that 20 years from now, a photograph
will be helpful to look at. In 20 years, one or more of these
machines may be ancient history, and so their printouts may be
useless in the long, long term. Eventually, one or more of these
machines will become the standard of care, I believe. We currently
use them for most patients at the Glaucoma Service at Wills, and
find them helpful. But, again, they do not replace our other tools.
P: Isn't there also a subjective component to the HRT in that
the clinician (not the technician, I assume) has to delineate
the outline of the disc? Or do I have that wrong, and does the
software determine or extrapolate the disc margin from the initial
baseline scan?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: You are correct: the HRT I and HRT II require
the doctor or technician to outline the disc. That influences
the machine's analysis of "normal" versus "glaucoma,"
but does not influence its ability to monitor long-term progression.
The HRT III (just released) apparently does not require outlining
the disc. The OCT and GDx do not require outlining of the disc
either.
P: If a person has tunnel vision in one eye, how accurate a reading
can the doctor get with a visual field test? By tunnel vision
I mean vision is clear straight ahead, but vision to the sides
or up or down is distorted or double.
Dr. Jonathan Myers: With "tunnel vision" or a "central
island," it is important to adjust the visual field test
parameters to get the most out of the test. It is useless to test
the far periphery when it is already gone. More time and attention
should be spent on the center. In these patients, watching the
remaining central island is important, to help guard what is left.
That raises a point regarding the imagers. Generally, they are
better in analyzing early to mid-stage glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma,
when most of the optic nerve is damaged, there is less to image,
and the image analyzers are much less useful in detecting progressive
damage. For that matter, with advanced disc damage, an image analyzer
is not needed to know there is glaucoma damage.
P: At what percentage of vision loss are field tests no longer
useful?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: When the patient does not see at least several
points consistently, then the field test cannot be used to look
for progressive change, and will not be helpful. That may occur
at different amounts of vision loss, depending on the exact clinical
situation. Usually, it is when the vision is down to less than
20/400, or a field of much less than 10 degrees.
P: Isn't it true that even measurement of intraocular pressure
can vary from doctor to doctor, on the same day, on the same machine?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The variability between two experienced doctors
using calibrated tonometers should be within 1 or at most 2 mm
Hg of pressure. The variability in the pressure from morning to
evening may be much more than that for a given patient, so the
time of day matters a lot, too. At this time, we don't have a
way to measure pressure continuously or frequently, which would
help a lot.
P: My HRT printouts list measurement changes for parts of the
optic nerve. Some are negative numbers; some are positive. Additionally,
the figures are very small -- hundredths or thousands of a millimeter.
Are such tiny shifts meaningful or consequential?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: For
most of the parameters on any of these machines, a change of more
than 10% of the value (for example, 0.1 mm2 out of
1 mm2 or 0.02 mm2 out of 0.2 mm2)
is necessary before you can be sure that the change is real and
not just fluctuation. Almost any change of significance
deserves a repeated test to confirm. Small changes are usually
just "noise" in the system -- movement, opacities (such
as cataracts or tear film issues), technician issues, etc.
P: I would think a visual field test that did not require the
patient to push a button, but somehow could measure a field without
any patient input would lead to far more accurate testing.
Dr. Jonathan Myers: The Acumap is a new approach to field testing
that looks at brain waves, like an EEG, to measure a patient's
ability to see lights. We are working with the Acumap to see how
it compares to the standard visual field. There are a lot of technical
challenges -- skull thickness, patients daydreaming - - that can
affect the test. So, our early results suggest similar findings
to fields, but we're not certain yet if it can replace fields.
We do know that even though it takes about twice as long as a
standard field test, patients like it much more.
P: How we would all welcome something like the Acumap and the
new tonometer that measures IOP through the closed eyelid! No
numbing drops needed in the eyes.
Dr. Jonathan Myers: I agree. However, we've found the through-the-eyelid
tonometer to be sadly inaccurate.
P: How is gonioscopy useful?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Gonioscopy is crucial to the diagnosis and
classification of glaucoma. Knowing the angle anatomy is crucial
to knowing the proper treatment for a given patient. Over time
and with treatments, the gonioscopic findings may change, and
so we usually repeat gonioscopy every one to several years.
P: How are floaters and vitreous detachments detected?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: Vitreous floaters and detachments can usually
be seen and evaluated at the slit lamp microscope by the clinician.
There are not good ways to image vitreous detachments, and the
treatment is limited to observation and monitoring for any sign
of a retinal detachment.
P: Even though I have an HRT yearly, my doctor still refuses
to base much of his evaluation on its numbers. He insists that
the software is still evolving, and its real utility will be proven
in retrospect. Which aspect of the HRT software needs to be improved
with successive generations of software to make it a more robust
objective test?
Dr. Jonathan Myers: We don't know much about the long-term performance
(greater than 5 years) of any of these instruments in comparison
to traditional measures. A 10- year study of a large number (more
than 100) of patients comparing progressive field loss, image
analyzer damage, clinician examinations, and other measures would
be hugely helpful. Some clinicians worry that some of the early
damage found with these machines may not turn out to correlate
with other measures over time. Studies suggest that the analyzers
will be more and more helpful, but your doctor isn't wrong. We
just are not sure yet.
Moderator: Thank you, Dr. Myers. Great answers.
Dr. Jonathan Myers: A pleasure to be with you all. Happy, healthy
New Year to all! Goodnight.
On December 14, Dr. Wilson discussed "Early and Late Complications
of Trabeculectomies" in the Chat room. Click
here for highlights of that meeting.
Click here for the most recent
glaucoma chat highlights and links to the chat archives.
Click here for
upcoming glaucoma chat events.
|