Common Mistakes Patients Make
Chat Highlights
March 8, 2006
Norma Devine, Editor
On Wednesday, March 8, 2006, Dr.
Rick Wilson, a glaucoma specialist at Wills, and the glaucoma
chat group discussed "Common Mistakes Patients Make."
Moderator: Tonight
the topic is “Common Mistakes Patients Make.” What
is the most common mistake patients make?
Dr.
Rick Wilson: The
most common mistake patients make is probably not taking their
drops consistently and persistently over the years. Several
studies have pointed out that the fluctuation in IOP (intraocular
pressure) that occurs naturally in everybody, but to a greater
extent in glaucoma patients, is a risk factor for progression.
Patients who do not take their medications spread out evenly
over the day, day to day, just make that fluctuation worse.
P: Is anything
being done to help patients improve compliance with taking eyedrops?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Yes. Alcon Inc, which supports the Glaucoma Service Foundation
Website with an educational grant, just came out with a compliance
monitor. The dropper bottle is placed in the monitor and
gives a warning when the next drop should be taken. It also records
whenever the lever to release a drop is squeezed. When the
patient returns to the doctor, he or she brings the monitor along.
The doctor puts the monitor in a holder and downloads data
to a computer about each time the patient took the medication.
That provides a complete record of the patient's compliance
with instructions.
What do you patients think about that? Would you consider
the monitor a help? An invasion of privacy? Would
you bring the monitor back to the doctor?
Moderator: I would,
if I am ever on drops again.
P: I would.
Maybe it would convince him that I AM taking my drops.
P: I would use it.
P:
I would use it, too.
P: I think
it would be a waste of time, except for those not willing to take
responsibility for their own health. Wouldn't the patients
who need it the most be the least likely to use it?
P: It does seem like an invasion of privacy, but not so bad if
it's optional.
P: I would think it would only be used for patients that the
doctor suspects are not compliant.
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Yes, but doctors are no better than chance at telling who of their
patients is taking their medication correctly. A monitor
like this is a good start to helping with the problem.
P: Such a monitor
would be good for forgetful elderly patients.
P: Those
things that all of you are mentioning are just so discouraging
for me as a glaucoma suspect. Why would I need to follow
up with a doctor and to have millions of drops that you ultimately
forget about even if you want to lead a normal life?
Dr. Rick Wilson: Most glaucoma suspects, when they are put on
medication, are only on one medication at bedtime for years. If
that keeps the patient from becoming symptomatic from poor vision,
it seems a small price to pay.
P: What is another common mistake patients make?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Many people make the mistake of choosing a doctor on the recommendation
of friends or neighbors, who usually base their judgment on the
personality of the doctor they chose. Personality is important,
but competence is paramount. A better way to pick a doctor
is to consult the specialties' Websites, like the American Glaucoma
Society's www.americanglaucomasociety.net.
Then see who your internist recommends and hope the two coincide.
The best way is to have a doctor in the family who will
do some sleuthing for you.
P: How important is it to get a second opinion for treatment
options?
Dr. Rick Wilson: It is very important, if you are concerned about
the way things are going or have any doubt about the suggested
treatment.
P: Is not seeing a glaucoma specialist a mistake?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Not if your glaucoma is in the early stages or is not complicated.
On the other hand, a glaucoma specialist costs no more than
a general ophthalmologist and should be more knowledgeable, if
there are any concerns about treatment options.
P: One of the biggest mistakes I've made over the years is not
asking my doctors more questions.
P: I asked
my doctor (a Wills Fellow) a lot of questions and told him I participated
in this chat room. He freaked out and said I talked too
much and had too many ideas. Imagine that!
Dr. Rick Wilson:
One way that I think helps to get your questions answered is to
think of them all and write them down in order of importance.
Then make a copy for the doctor. He can read quickly
through them and answer them, one after another, without being
exasperated by the amount of time you are taking. Remember,
managed care and Medicare have cut back severely on the amount
they pay doctors for each visit, so the doctor has to see more
people than he used to in order to keep his office afloat. That
results in a time stress with each patient.
P: I, too,
told my doctor about this chat room and he didn't seem impressed.
I would think that most doctors would be happy that any
patient was getting support of some kind.
P: I worry about
the people like me, who stay with incompetent doctors simply because
they don't know about glaucoma specialists. Thank goodness
for this Website.
P: An eye doctor
told me he feels that some, many, of his colleagues are using
highly aggressive treatment for glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect
patients when it probably isn't warranted. The doctor thinks
they are concerned about malpractice suits. Comment, please.
Dr. Rick Wilson:
For some, the use of the selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT)
as a first-line treatment is, unfortunately, influenced by the
financial return. The most common mistake I see referring
doctors making is treating patients with the laser who have no
chance of any enduring improvement. That is not to gloss
over the huge increase in defensive medicine, with more tests
and treatment than would otherwise be prescribed.
P: Can you please be more specific about what you mean by "enduring
improvement"?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Young patients, say under 60 years of age, and those with little
pigment in their trabecular meshwork, are unlikely to get a year
or more of IOP lowering with an SLT or ALT (argon laser trabeculoplasty).
For me, it is more prudent to move on to either maximal medical
therapy, if it has not yet been reached, or on to more effective
surgery, like trabeculectomy.
P: Is it
common for patients to mistakenly rush into surgery when alternatives
are available? Or the reverse, to avoid it when needed?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
That is a mistake. Putting off surgery for too long adds
to the extent of optic nerve damage accrued before definitive
treatment is given. Most glaucoma specialists are conservative
about cutting surgery, and more aggressive with laser surgery
and its fewer complications.
P: When
my Mom was living, she always told me to be aware that I might
develop glaucoma, because she was diagnosed with it. A doctor
told me that she may not have had glaucoma. She could have been
a glaucoma suspect, and therefore I may be a glaucoma suspect.
Any advice for glaucoma suspects?
Dr. Rick Wilson:
My advice for suspects is to be seeing an ophthalmologist who
uses a short-wavelength automated perimeter, the blue-on-yellow
perimeter, that will pick up an abnormal visual field several
years before the white-on-white perimeter. Also, don't drop
out of follow-up. Just because you have been told you don't
have definite disease yet, glaucoma could be caught at any time
and the disease deserves good follow-up.
P: My Mom's
doctor retired around the time of her death in 2001. I am
trying to get her records. Maybe they are archived somewhere.
Dr. Rick Wilson: Good night and good luck!
Moderator: Thanks,
Dr. Wilson.
Dr. Rick Wilson:
Have a wonderful week.
On March 15, Dr. Wilson discussed "Lowering Intraocular Pressure" in the
Chat room. Click here for highlights
of that meeting.
Click here for the most recent
glaucoma chat highlights and links to the chat archives.
Click here for
upcoming glaucoma chat events.
|