Making Decisions
Chat Highlights
April 21, 2010
Steven Beck, Editor
On Wednesday, April 21, 2010, Dr.
Michael Pro, a glaucoma specialist at Wills, and the glaucoma
chat group discussed "Making Decisions".
Moderator: Hello,
this is your Moderator. Tonight's topic is “Making Decisions”
with Dr. Michael Pro.
P:
How does a physician make the decision when to begin treatment
for glaucoma?
Dr. Pro:
First, there are guidelines that we have learned from our training.
We are taught to look for certain exam findings and weigh certain
risk factors. This goes into making a decision to treat or not
to treat. So with this in mind you have to consider that every
patient may fit into a generalized pattern, but is still an individual
with individual treatment needs. In the U.S. there is no strict
treatment guideline. For instance, nowhere does it say that we
should treat every patient who comes in the door with an IOP over
21. Other countries or regions do have more specific guidelines
regarding treatment of glaucoma.
P:
What observations or tests need to be performed prior to writing
the first prescription?
Dr. Pro:
First you need to take a good history: what is the past ocular
history, medical history, and family history? You then need to
perform a good examination including vision, and slit lamp exam.
Sometimes specific tests are performed which are helpful, like
a visual field, corneal thickness, and nerve imaging.
P:
Is it ever best to begin treatment for glaucoma with lasers or
surgery?
Dr. Pro:
This has been studied in several trials. The Glaucoma Laser Trial
looked at treating patients with either an ALT (a type of laser
procedure that can lower the IOP) or with drops. The laser patients
did as well as the drop patients. A similar trial looked at initial
surgical therapy (a trabeculectomy) versus medical therapy. Here,
too, the two groups were equal.
So, why do we usually start with drops first? Here's how I look
at it. You can consider therapy on a safety scale. Generally all
drops can have side effects, but they are usually mild and reverse
once the drop is stopped. Meanwhile lasers are also safe, but
in rare patients you can see persistent or serious problems. Finally
eye surgery of any sort, like a trabeculectomy, can lead to rare
but serious complications.
P:
Should every patient obtain a second opinion about their care,
and if so, when? If not, why not?
Dr. Pro:
I would not seek a second opinion for every routine decision,
especially if you have a trusting relationship with you doctor,
but certainly get one if you are presented with a serious decision,
like surgery, and you feel you have not had the situation or alternatives
explained.
P:
I went for second opinions when I was scared, hoping for a magic
bullet. Unfortunately, they all agreed with course of treatment
at that time.
P:
Should a patient tell they doctor they would like a second opinion?
Is it offensive to you to have a patient say they would like another
opinion?
Dr. Pro:
Well, for the doctor it may be natural to feel put off, but you
really have to try to see the situation from the patient perspective.
When a patient wonders if they could get a second opinion, I welcome
it. The only time I am concerned is when I feel the patient needs
urgent surgery and I worry that the patient is taking a risk by
delaying care.
P:
Do doctors usually agree on the need for surgery?
Dr. Pro: Yes,
I think most glaucoma specialists are usually on the same page.
I think this is because we only see patients with glaucoma, so
most of out patients fit into recognizable patterns, and we recognize
when a patient is in danger of having their glaucoma worsen.
Moderator: This
ends our moderated chat with Dr. Pro. Good night doctor. Thank
you!
Dr. Pro:
Thank you. Goodnight!
On May 5 Dr. Moster discussed "Neurology and Glaucoma" in the
Chat room. Highlights for this chat coming soon.
Click here for highlights
of that meeting.
Click here for the most recent
glaucoma chat highlights and links to the chat archives.
Click here for
upcoming glaucoma chat events.
|